by Ben Popken
Can you indicate the inequality between music that passed through a expensive Monster stereo Cable, and a coating hanger? A reader forwarded us a locate from the Audioholics Home base Theater Forum and its father says no. He says his relation ran an procedure on him and four other audio aficionados listening to a new CD from a new set blindfolded. Seven bizarre songs were played, each occasion heard with the speaker hooked up to Monster Cables, and the other notwithstanding, hooked up to parka hanger wire. Nobody could condition which was the Monster Cable and which was the spread hanger. The kicker? None of the subjects even knew that anorak hangers were prospering to be employed. This is, of class, "nothing new," a Google of "monster cables vs anorak hangers" shows that some users have been saying this for a while. Still, this is an test begging to be recreated under controlled conditions (say, for as it happens, a spitting image-hoodwink study). Principles tolerable occupation! Understand how it went down, in quod...
I'm so penitent, but I do not buy into 90% of the hype brought to us audiophiles by the commercial sector of our avocation and the severely play assiduity at at liberty. My companion, an audio engineering whiz kid has proven to me what is veritable and what is not. Let me review with you an norm of how he does this.
We gathered up a 5 of our audio buddies. We took my "old" Martin Logan SL-3 (not a bad speaker for nice dissonance making) and hooked them up with Monster 1000 speaker cables [ed. Monster Ultra Series THX 1000 Audio Interconnects] (generous cables according to the audio converge). We also rigged up 14 capacity, oxygen not busy Belden stranded copper wire with a straightforward PVC jacket. Both were 2 meters covet. They were connected to an ABX lash box allowing sightless go out of business testing. Book levels were set at 75 Db at 1000K Hz. A momentous mark recording of well-ordered, triplex, unhurried listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass). None of us had heard this number or CD before, therefore eliminating biases. The music was played. Of the 5 ruse folded, only 2 guessed correctly which was the monster cable. (I was not one of them). This was done 7 times in a row! Keeping us shade folded, my relation switched out the Belden wire (are you at one's fingertips for this) with elementary paint hanger wire! Humble to me and our 12 audiophile buddies, erstwhile to the ABX delusional unaware probe, he took individually four anorak hangers, reconnected them and twisted them into a dyad of speaker cables. Connections were soldered. He stashed them in a closet within the testing range so we were not privy to what he was up to. This made for a set of two of 2 meter cables, the precise period of the other wires. The examination was conducted. After 5 tests, none could clinch which was the Monster 1000 cable or the film hanger wire. Further, when music was played through the coating hanger wire, we were asked if what we heard sounded agreeable to us. All agreed that what was heard sounded excuse, however, when A-B tests occurred, it was unachievable to regulate which sounded most adroitly the best part of the age and which wire was in use. As a matter of course to say, after the unthinking folds came off and we saw what my kin did, we erudite he was unerringly...most of what manufactures have to say about their products is vestal hype. It seems the more they censure, the more hyped it is. This is for a impecunious run of cable. If you're universal over 50 ft, then you may help from think twice shielding, but for most serene people's bailiwick theaters, this is not the cover. Muse on folks, a moment ago because something performs bigger spec-well-considered doesn't great it indeed sounds more intelligent. Specs are one emotional attachment, psychoacoustics are another. Of obviously, a overcoat hanger doesn't have a Monster Cable lifetime commitment, so if your anorak hanger breaks, you'll have to go out and buy another overlay hanger.
...
Read more...